South San Francisco USD | BP 4119.1 Personnel
Civil And Legal Rights
The Governing Board believes that the personal life of an employee is not an appropriate concern of the district, except as it may directly relate to the employee's performance of his/her duties.
An employee's religious or political activities, or lack thereof, shall not be grounds for any discrimination or disciplinary action by the district, provided that these activities do not violate law, Board policy, or administrative regulation.
(cf. 4030 - Nondiscrimination in Employment)
A teacher shall have the right to refuse to submit to any evaluation or survey conducted by the district concerning personal values, attitudes, and beliefs; sexual orientation; political affiliations or opinions; critical appraisals of other individuals with whom the teacher has a family relationship; or religious affiliations or beliefs. (Education Code 49091.24)
The district shall make no inquiry concerning the personal values, attitudes, and beliefs of district employees or their sexual orientation or political or religious affiliations, beliefs, or opinions except when authorized by law. In addition, no district employee shall be required to provide critical appraisals of other individuals with whom the employee has a familial relationship. However, the district reserves the right to access any publicly available information about any employee.
Employees do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy with regards to district property under an employee's control including, but not limited to, desks, classrooms, offices, file cabinets, computers, or phones. When necessary to protect the health, welfare, or safety of students and staff, school officials may search district property under an employee's control.
(cf. 3515 - Campus Security)
(cf. 4040 - Employee Use of Technology)
An employee shall have the right to disclose to a Board member, a school administrator, a member of the County Board of Education, County Superintendent of Schools, or the Superintendent of Public Instruction any improper governmental activity by the district or a district employee that violates state or federal law, is economically wasteful, or involves gross misconduct, incompetency, or inefficiency. When the employee has reasonable cause to believe that the information discloses a violation of state or federal statute or a violation or noncompliance with a state or federal rule or regulation, he/she has the right to disclose such information to a government or law enforcement agency or to refuse to participate in any such activity. (Education Code 44112, 44113; Labor Code 1102.5)
The Superintendent or designee shall prominently display in lettering larger than size 14 point type a list of employees' rights and responsibilities under the whistleblower laws, including the telephone number of the whistleblower hotline maintained by the office of the California Attorney General. (Labor Code 1102.8)
No employee shall use or attempt to use his/her official authority or influence to intimidate, threaten, coerce, or command another employee for the purpose of interfering with that employee's right to disclose improper governmental activity. (Education Code 44113)
(cf. 4118 - Suspension/Disciplinary Action)
(cf. 4218 - Dismissal/Suspension/Disciplinary Action)
An employee who has disclosed improper governmental activity and believes that he/she has subsequently been subjected to acts or attempted acts of reprisal shall file a written complaint in accordance with the district's complaint procedures. After filing a complaint with the district, he/she may also file a copy of the complaint with local law enforcement in accordance with Education Code 44114.
(cf. 1312.1 - Complaints Concerning District Employees)
(cf. 1312.3 - Uniform Complaint Procedures)
Protection Against Liability
No employee shall be liable for harm caused by his/her act or omission when acting within the scope of employment or district responsibilities. For the protection against liability to apply, the act or omission must be in conformity with federal, state, and local laws and must be in furtherance of an effort to control, discipline, expel, or suspend a student, or to maintain order or control in the classroom or school. (20 USC 6736)
(cf. 3320 - Claims and Actions Against the District)
(cf. 9260 - Legal Protection)
The protection against liability shall not apply when: (20 USC 6736)
1. The employee acted with willful or criminal misconduct, gross negligence, recklessness, or a conscious, flagrant indifference to the harmed person's right to safety.
2. The employee caused harm by operating a motor vehicle or other vehicle requiring license or insurance.
3. The employee was not properly licensed, if required, by state law for such activities.
4. The employee was found by a court to have violated a federal or state civil rights law.
5. The employee was under the influence of alcohol or any drug at the time of the misconduct.
6. The misconduct constituted a crime of violence pursuant to 18 USC 16 or an act of terrorism for which the employee has been convicted in a court.
7. The misconduct involved a sexual offense for which the employee has been convicted in a court.
8. The misconduct occurred during background investigations, or other actions, involved in the employee's hiring.
44040 Discrimination based on employee's appearance before certain boards or committees
48907 Student freedom of expression; employee's protection of student rights
48950 Speech and other communication
49091.24 Teacher rights to refuse evaluation/survey of personal life
51 Unruh Civil Rights Act
815.3 Intentional torts
825.6 Indemnification of public entity
3540.1 Public employment definitions
3543.5 Interference with employee's rights prohibited
12650-12656 False claims actions
UNITED STATES CODE, TITLE 18
16 Crime of violence defined
UNITED STATES CODE, TITLE 20
UNITED STATES CODE, TITLE 42
2000e-2000e-17 Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended
2000h-2000h-6 Title IX, 1972 Education Act Amendments
12101-12213 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hartnett v. Crosier, (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 685
Johnson v. Poway Unified School District, (2011) 658 F.3d 954
Ohton v. CSU San Diego, (2007) 56 Cal.Rptr.3d 111
Garcetti v. Ceballos, (2006) 543 U.S. 1186
O'Conner v. Ortega, (1987) 480 U.S. 709
New Jersey v. T.L.O., (1985) 468 U.S. 325
California Attorney General: http://www.oag.ca.gov
Policy SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
adopted: March 28, 2013 South San Francisco, California